Aitareya Upanishad Lecture 04 on 13 August 2023: Difference between revisions

From Wiki Vedanta
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (category)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Full Transcript(Not Corrected) ==
== Full Transcript(Corrected) ==
OM JANANIM SHARADAM DEVIM RAMAKRISHNAM JAGAD GURUM PADAPADME TAYO SHRITVA PRANAMAMI MUHURMUHU
We are studying the ''Aitareya Upanishad'', one of the most marvellous ''Upanishads''. Mostly, this ''Upanishad'' starts with a ''Srishti Krama''. What is the point? The point is that if the cause is ''Atman'', the ''Srishti'', the effect must also be ''Atman''. What is the meaning of creation? Why did God create it?
OM VAMME MANASI PRATISTHITA MANOME VACHI PRATISTHITAM AVIRAVIRMAIDHI VEDASYAMA ANISTAHA SHRUTAMME MAPRAHASI
ANENA DETE NAHO RATRAN SAMDHA DHYAMRUTAM VADISHYAME SATYAM VADISHYAME
TANMA AMAVATO TAD VAKTARAM AVATO AMA VAKTARAM AVATO VAKTARAM
OM SHANTE SHANTE SHANTE HARE OM
OM May my speech be fixed in my mind. May my mind be fixed in my speech.
O Self-luminous Brahman, be manifest to me.
O Mind and Speech, may both of you bring me the meaning of the Vedas.
May what I study from the Vedas not leave me.
I shall strive day and night to master what I have heard through this study.
I shall think of the right. I shall speak of the right.
May Brahman protect me. May Brahman protect the teacher.
May Brahman protect me. May Brahman protect the teacher.
OM PEACE PEACE PEACE BE UNTO ALL
We are studying the Aitareya Upanishad, one of the most marvellous Upanishads.
Mostly this Upanishad starts with a Srishti Krama.
What is the point? The point is that if the cause is Atman,
the Srishti, the effect must also be Atman.
What is the meaning of creation? Why did God create it?
In this world, we find something very peculiar.
When a person is enjoying this world, he never thinks of anything else.
He always gives credit to himself.
I have worked hard and I have earned it.
It is my divine right to enjoy it.
But when the opposite happens, a person starts thinking,
Who is responsible for my suffering? I don't want to suffer at all.
Here the Upanishad is going to tell us, the Srishti is not created,
never meant either for happiness or for suffering.
What then is it meant? Both happiness and suffering,
enjoyment and pain, they are meant only for one purpose.
What lessons can we learn and get out of this place?
Both are necessary, like two wings of a bird.
A bird can never fly with only one wing.
Perhaps it can, but it is so much more difficult.
But it is impossible without the wings for a bird to fly.
Without legs, man cannot easily travel.
Now what is the point? Creation is meant for us,
so that we can experience the world, we can learn the lessons.
Very often I tell people, one of the best scriptures in the world is newspapers.
You may be surprised, Thakur used to hate newspapers
because it contains worldly things.
But if we have the eyes of wisdom with one attitude,
we should study anything, be it scriptures, be it newspapers, anything with one purpose.
What is this going to teach me? What lessons can I learn?
Scriptures also can tell us, but very often we are surprised.
The scriptures tell us how to look at the world.
For example, you are born and you grow up, one day you will die.
Anything that is born is going to die.
We know this, we experience it, we see it every day,
but we don't learn our lesson. That is the way the scripture is trying to tell us,
because the scripture not only tells us that God exists,
we have come from God, the entire creation has come from God,
and our goal is to go back from where we have come.
Mano chalo nija nikethane, O mind, let us go back to our own abode, our abode, our birthplace.
It is only God, but that fact we do not know.
That is what the scriptures tell us.
That is why they are called Apaurusheya.
Apaurusheya means whatever we experience,
so we can only convey what we know to other people.
And what we know is this world only.
And therefore, what can this world teach?
It can teach us a lot.
What is it that we want?
We don't want to die.
We don't want to become old.
We don't want to suffer.
Always we want to be happy.
Can we get it in this world?
Absolutely no.
If we really analyze and compare, what is the proportion of suffering to the amount of happiness we get?
Is it at least 50-50%?
No.
Swami Yathishanth Maharaj used to tell a beautiful story.
Once a man went to a restaurant in England.
At that time, the Second World War was going on.
Food material was very scarce.
And he had not tasted the flesh of rabbit for a long time.
But suddenly, to his great delight, he found a restaurant announcing rabbit meat served here.
So gladly, he rushed in to order a dish of rabbit meat.
And he was served.
He was eating.
He knew what is rabbit's meat.
But he was not getting.
So he called the cook and said,
Is there really rabbit flesh here?
Cook said, Yes, sir.
I don't get the taste.
Then the waiter confessed,
Sir, rabbits are very scarce.
So we have to mix some horse flesh.
Oh!
So what is the proportion?
He said 50-50.
What is 50-50?
One rabbit versus one horse.
Naturally, he is not getting the taste of the rabbit.
At least, if we can get 50% of happiness in this world,
we can say that some justification is there.
But truly, if we say 23 hours and 23 hours of a day and 58 minutes,
we are laboring hard, maybe one second, two seconds,
we get some experience of pleasure.
How much time does it take to prepare a sweet?
How much time does it take to really enjoy it?
Before, there is hard work.
Afterwards, we have to digest it.
So many complications can come later on.
But that moment, alone we count, forget everything,
and the world is very happy.
No.
So as I was saying earlier, newspapers
can teach us a great lesson.
Two such lessons we can learn.
I am highlighting them.
What is the first lesson?
The very first lesson is that everything
is fast changing in this world.
That is the first part of the first lesson.
The second part of the first lesson is people are the same.
Life is the same from the beginning of creation
until eternity.
Nothing changes.
There were good people, there were bad people,
and the proportion is like 50-50.
So this has not changed.
Previously, we called them Rakshasas, Ravanasuras.
Now we call them politicians, Hitlers.
No difference at all.
But the people who suffer are ordinary people.
Even now, the same thing is going on.
That's why Swamiji made a remarkable statement.
There is no democracy anywhere to be found.
Everywhere, people are ruled by a few number of selfish,
petty, but very powerful, ruthless people.
Call them politicians by whatever blessed name
you want to call them.
So this is the first lesson.
What is the second lesson?
If you have to read newspaper, then you
read the obituary column.
People you know, people you don't know, young, old,
they are dead.
It could be murder.
It could be accident.
It could be old age.
It could be any, for any reason.
If we read newspaper in this way,
then we can learn a great lesson.
Because I am in the world.
I can also change.
But the most important lesson we learn from the scriptures.
Now I am discriminating between the newspaper
and the scripture.
The newspaper tells us what is the nature of the world
very vividly.
But the scripture alone can tell us.
Is there any way out?
Yes.
Does God exist?
Yes.
What do I gain if I realize God?
If I go to God?
If I am with Him?
Call it Moksha.
Call it Vaikuntha.
Call it attainment of Brahman.
Let us not quarrel with words.
What do I gain?
For eternity, I will have no death.
I will have only Sat.
I will never be ignorant.
I will be all-knowing.
And I will be Paramananda Swaroopa.
I will not have happiness.
I will repeat.
I will not have happiness.
I become happiness.
That is my nature.
And in this world, whatever we are experiencing,
this is called experiential happiness.
It is all coming.
That is called having mode of happiness,
not being mode of happiness.
This is the essence of every Upanishad.
It wants to tell us what we should have learned.
Without the aid of any scripture,
the nature of the world,
there is birth, there is growth, there is death.
Nobody lives forever.
And we cannot separate happiness and unhappiness.
They come together.
They also go together.
But the world can never tell us
where from the world has come
and who is the originator
or what is the nature of the cause,
Karana.
Sarva Karana Karana.
And what is the nature of that Karana.
And reminds us,
Karana and Karya can never be different.
If clay is the Karana,
anything made out of clay will be only clay, etc.
We discussed already about it.
If I am coming from God,
if you are coming from God,
if the entire Loka is coming from God,
then it must be God only
because the world is effect,
God is the original cause.
This is the great lesson.
But there are further lessons.
I am telling you this because
that we have many misunderstandings about creation.
So the next misunderstanding about creation is
that why God has created me.
Of course, real answer we will never know.
From our experience only,
we can understand.
God created the world,
not for his sake,
but for our sake.
What is it?
I have done Karma
and therefore I create my own world
to exhaust my own
Purva Janma Karma.
So who is the Brahma?
I am the Brahma.
Who is the Vishnu?
I am the Vishnu.
And who is the Shiva?
I am the Shiva.
I created this world.
I am maintaining the world
and I dissolve the world.
How did I create the world?
Because of my Purva Karma.
And how am I maintaining?
To exhaust my Purva Janma Karma phala.
Purva Janma doesn't mean only the very last birth.
No.
It could be any of the millions of births
I had previously.
Then what am I doing?
I am creating new Karma.
I cannot have any power
to change what has happened in the past.
But God has given us that freedom.
From this moment onwards,
whatever can be done,
I can do it consciously,
purposefully,
with thoughtfulness.
That is the purpose.
So, this is how we have to understand.
Like Brahma also has a day and night.
But that Brahma is like the grandmother.
In Sri Ramakrishna's parable,
there is a grandmother
and she gathers different seeds
from different vegetables
after the harvest is over.
And she dries the seeds
and she keeps the seeds.
When the next rainy season comes,
what does she do?
She just prepares the ground.
But she puts the seeds.
Where from the seed has come?
From its past birth.
And what does it grow into?
Into its own nature.
But this analogy
has to be expanded.
Human beings have the freedom.
Slowly but surely.
And by taking the advice of the teachers,
the scriptures,
our own anubhava,
acharya, shastra,
swanubhava,
we can slowly become better people.
But we have to struggle for it.
That is why in the Bhagavad Gita,
very first opening shloka,
dharmakshetram kurukshetram.
dharmakshetre kurukshetre.
Dharmakshetram.
Kshetram means a field.
Field means
that which is ready for cultivation.
But it is called
dharmakshetra.
You sow poisonous seeds,
poisonous plant will grow.
You sow
immortality, seeds of
sweet mango,
sweet mangoes will grow.
That is why it is called dharmakshetra.
It will not give
a result which we do not deserve.
But at the same time,
it is kurukshetra.
Kuru means do.
You will have to cultivate it.
If you simply sit,
it is not going to happen.
No result will come.
But it is not true.
If we do not do anything,
no result will come.
That is not true.
If we do not do,
we will become worse and worse
and worse.
Just like if we do not do exercise,
we are going only to
become worse
and worse.
This is the background.
Srishti is good and
if we are enjoying or suffering,
we are responsible.
Srishti is good because
every millisecond
is a new opportunity
for us to learn
our lessons.
Our first lesson is
what have I learned from this life
until now.
Second lesson is
what can I do to better my situation.
This is called evolution.
And God is always
ready to bestow His grace.
With this background,
we will start.
Already I have started.
The first mantra is
telling an irrefutable fact.
What is that fact?
Om Atmava
Idam
Eka Eva Agre
Asit
Na Anyat Kinchana
Mishat
What does it mean?
Om is for the sake of beginning
something auspicious.
Atmava
So which Atma?
Is it Jivatma or Paramatma?
It is only Paramatma because
Srishti has not started.
Without Srishti,
the question of Jivatma
does not arise.
So therefore, Atmava
Idam
means whatever was existing
Eka Eva
Agre Asit
Only one Atman is there.
Eka Eva
Ekaha Eva
One only.
Why those words?
Ekaha means
there are technical reasons for that
and we are thankful to
Shankaracharya
for expounding that technical reasons.
What is the nature
of this world?
First of all, it is an
effect.
And this world
has got three characteristics.
What are those?
It is full
of differences.
I, you, he,
she, they, it,
living, non-living
and all
the differences in the
world are subdivided
by Vedanta
into three categories.
They are called Vijatiya
Bheda, Sajatiya Bheda
and Swagata
Bheda. What is Vijatiya
Bheda? Two trees are
there. As an example, two
trees are there, mango tree
and coconut tree or two animals
are there. There is a cow
and there is an elephant.
Everything
is, every species
is different. That is called Jati.
Vijatiya means
different species,
separate species
and this world, everything
is different from everything else.
Then, not only that,
having divided
Vijatiya, in every
Jati also, there is
a Sajatiya. Two mango
trees, two dogs,
two elephants, two
human beings. No
two human beings are alike.
It is said
no two
hairs on the head of a
human being are ever
exactly the same. There will be
color difference, difference
of size, difference of
length, difference of color,
difference of fragility,
etc.
Once I have seen a book,
it is full of photographs.
What are the photographs?
Somebody had taken
the snowfall.
Snow
is falling mostly in the
western countries. In Himalayas
also you can see snow
is raining
and when the snow is falling,
this person had taken a
very special camera,
a very magnifying
camera.
Each of these snow
drops can be magnified
into a thousand
or even more
in size.
And then this person was astonished.
He started taking
photos everywhere.
And then what did he find?
First of all,
no two snow drops
are of the same size.
Secondly,
every snow drop
is of that
delicate, intricate,
inimitable
design. It is
astonishing. As if
a goldsmith
had designed these
things. It is what they call nowadays
designer cloths or
designer snow drops.
Only Bhagawan can do it.
When we look at them on the ground,
they all look the same.
Here also looks the same.
But when we look at
each separate individual,
no two leaves are
alike, no two heaves
are alike, no two snow drops
are alike.
This is called Sajatiya Bheda.
Then,
even if you take
one tree, for example,
both are coconut trees
or both are mango trees,
take any one tree,
one mango tree, this is called
Swagatha Bheda.
There is a difference.
This is the root.
This is the trunk.
This is the big branch.
Big branch gives birth
to so many smaller branches.
And they give birth to
still smaller branches.
Then there are leaves.
Then there are blossoms.
Then there are fruits.
Everything is different.
Every part is
different from each other.
And a very
marvelous fact is,
on the same tree, there will be
so many birds and all
of them, some are eating the fruits,
some are eating the leaves,
some worms are eating,
some insects are
eating the bark,
some are eating, burrowing
into the, for example,
there is a bird which
pecks into the,
this one makes a hole and
sucks the juice
out of it.
It is called woodpecker.
So, so many birds,
every part of the
tree is utilized.
What is this Paramatma?
He is Eka Ewa.
There is no Vijatiya
Veda, there is no Sajjatiya
Veda, and there is no
Swagatha Veda.
Eka, there is no
second one other
than Him. And that is said,
na anyat
kinchana mishat.
There is nothing.
Mishat means, literal meaning
winking.
Mishat means what?
That which is a second
creature, a second object.
That's why Eka Ewa.
Nothing is there.
Neither living.
Mishat means winking.
Winking means only a
living creature. I am winking.
You are winking.
A dog is winking.
Etc, etc. So na kinchana.
Not even one.
Mishat, winking creature.
That means living.
Shankaracharya adds, mishat
means, also we have to take
amishat, means
there is neither living being
nor non-living.
This difference between the living
and the non-living will come only
after this rishti.
So, what does
rishti mantra mean? Only
Paramatma was, but
we have to extend the meaning and said
even after
this creation has come out,
there is nothing else
but only
Paramatma.
In order to
make us understand it,
Ikshata
has been changed into
Aikshata. Aikshata
means he saw.
He saw means he visualized.
He visualized
means he thought.
He thought means
he is, see, in this world
whenever we look
at any object,
we find two causes.
One is called
material cause. Another is
called intelligent cause.
We can also add
another cause that is
called instrumental cause.
Take the familiar example.
A potter
takes clay. Clay
is the material cause.
Then he takes a wheel
that is called instrumental
cause.
And then he is the
intelligent cause.
Nimitta in Sanskrit
intelligent cause is called
nimitta karana and
upadana karana means material
cause. So with the help
of some instrument,
an intelligent cause
fashions, creates
something different but
he requires a material.
So here
the
Aitareya Upanishad is telling
us that there is only
Paramatma and
He created this world.
That detail will come later on.
But we are
forestalling
what is to come.
So he said that
let me create the worlds.
Then you know,
Bhagawan is called
satyakamaha, satya sankalpaha.
Very beautiful words.
What does it mean? First of all
satyakamaha means
He will never wish for anything
which is asatya, mithya.
That is which is
changing,
which is not useful,
which is inauspicious,
etc.
Whatever He desires, it will be
only satya. And there is
a beautiful saying
satyam eva jayate
na anrutam.
That is
untruth can never prime.
Only truth because
untruth will change.
Satyam will never change.
So the technical
definition of satyam is
trikala
abadhitam satyam.
That which
never changes
in three times, past, present
and future. That is
defined technically as
satyam. When Bhagawan
wishes, He cannot
wish anything else because
even if He wishes
something untruth, let me
create, He cannot create because
He is the
Vishwabrahmanda.
He is infinite. There is nothing
besides Him. Ekameva
agre asit.
He cannot wish.
And then He is also called
satyasankalpaha. Whatever
wish comes into His mind,
immediately it
gets fulfilled. We get this
tenesisya as
tremendous faith
in these scriptures
and in the Guru.
That is called Shraddha.
As an example of this Shraddha,
many times I have quoted,
maybe in other contexts,
there was a disciple of Sri Ramakrishna.
He was called
Nagamahasaya and one day
he came to see Sri Ramakrishna
at Dakshineshwar
or Kaushipur, I do not
remember, and
as he was about to enter
the room, he heard
I feel like eating
an omelette
as a sour fruit,
a peculiar type
of fruit. Immediately
he left the place.
That was not this. It is a seasonal
fruit. It is impossible
to get it practically
at other seasons. You know
many things when they are not seasonal,
we human
beings are intelligent. We
pickle them. Every country
does it, whether it is cabbage,
cauliflower,
or brinjal,
tomato, and of course
lemon
and omelette,
everything.
But Nagamahasaya
had that faith. My Guru's
mouth uttered these words.
It must be somewhere.
He went and started searching in
gardens continuously
for three days
without sleep. He
searched. At last he found
a few omelettes hanging
and then with the permission of the watchman
took those things, straight
came back to Sri Ramakrishna.
See the Uru Bhakti
now. Sri Ramakrishna was very
happy. Now
you must have read this incident
but what we have to understand
is, did you think that there
is any meaning behind this incident?
Was Sri Ramakrishna
like us,
really longing
for eating an omelette?
A man of
what is called Nirvikalpa
Samadhi, do you think
he cannot live?
Strange thing is, when we are
sick, we long
for our body
automatically longs for something
which is useful for the body
to repair itself
because this omelette
contains high quantity
of vitamin C and so many other things
I don't know but it is
very health productive.
Was it or
he wanted to test,
to show to other people
the Shraddha
or what were the other people doing?
Sir, we are very sorry
it is not available now.
They did not have the Shraddha
that means what?
They considered him as an ordinary
person. He simply had
this desire
and now unfortunately
we would like to fulfill it
but we know it is not possible.
Naga Maharshi thought
it is impossible that
a word like that will come
from a Satyavanta Purusha
because Brahma
with Brahmaiva Bhavati
whatever comes from his mouth
from the mouth of a realized
soul must be real only.
Satyakamaha
Satyasankalpaha
Remember the story of
Satyakama Jabala
he was Satyakama
that is why he spoke the truth
that is why
the Guru also who was
an enlightened soul
he also has
accepted him
because he spoke the truth
what was the truth?
I am a bastard
that was the truth
but who can say I am a bastard
only a Brahmana
only who is a Brahmana
a Satyavanta
only who can speak truth
Now Sri Ramakrishna took
and he was
very observant, his eyes are
extraordinarily observant
he noticed
that Nagamashaya had not eaten
already he was sickly looking
and now even
three days very tired
but extremely happy
I could fulfill
my Guru's desire
then Sri Ramakrishna immediately asked
please go and take food
Nagamashaya you know what he did
he refused
he did not say no
he said sir I am fasting
because today is Ekadashi
and I was observing
Ekadashi, I will not take
what did Sri Ramakrishna do?
he said ok
he asked a devotee
bring a big plate full of food
from downstairs
and it was brought
and Sri Ramakrishna just
touched a little bit to his mouth
and said now you eat
and without murmur
Nagamashaya
ate it, why?
because Guru Prasada
is even more sacred
than any
Prasada and fast
can be broken
what is the purpose of fasting?
to obtain more devotion to God
what is the purpose of eating
Guru Prasada?
to have more Guru Bhakti
and Guru Bhakti is
more of Divine Bhakti
we have seen the very last
mantras of the Shweta Shwetra Upanishad
Yasya Deve
Para Bhakti
Yatha Guru Tatha Deve
Yatha Deve
Tatha Guru
no difference between
Ishta Devata and Guru
Nagamashaya exemplified
illustrated
that tremendous
Shriddha, these are the
lessons we have to learn
and here also we have to learn
the lessons
what is the meaning of
Agra Eka Eva
Agra means
before creation
only Paramatma was there
therefore
what is the implication?
the whole creation must have
come from Him because
there was nothing else
but what was the nature of Paramatma?
He is what is called
three types of Vedas
Abhedaha
Bheda Rahitaha
is not having
Ide Vijatiye Bheda
Sajjatiye Bheda
Swagata Bheda that is the one meaning
of Eka because
He is partless Akhanda
He is also
Ananta
He was there and He is
Nitya Shuddha
Uddha Mukta
Swaroopaha nothing else
but that
Agra Asit
and nothing was there
that means before creation
He was alone there
then what did He do?
Sa Ekshata
then He thought
He visualized
Lokannu Srija Iti
may I become many
let me create the worlds
is the literal meaning
Lokannu
Srija Iti
let me create the worlds
now if He was
like a potter
He required material cause
like a potter requires
potter cannot make a pot
out of himself
he has to take
another substance which is called
clay a goldsmith
gold
a carpenter
wood so also
here Bhagawan there is nothing
else that is said
nothing else is there
that means what
He is the material cause
then
Ekshata means what
He desired
He visualized
what is the meaning of visualizing
previous Kalpa
I have created like this
so this Kalpa also
I will create exactly
the same thing
this is one of the strangest
truths
Swami Vivekananda expounds
this world
you I
this world is Russian war
this slavery of
India by the
first the Turks
then the Mughals
then the French people
then the Dutch people
then the British people
and then the slavery of India
by our present enlightened
politicians quarreling
shouting at each other
this was there in
Purva Kalpa that was there exactly
in the same way Purva Kalpa
that was there exactly the same
when Anadi Kala
since beginning
less time that is why Srishti
is called Anadi
oh then
sir do I have to
attend this
Maya Upanishad class
especially expounded by you
again in next Kalpa also
yes
unfortunately yes
I can't say no
I am glad that I will be
having you students eternally
is it a compliment
no it is not a compliment
it is a derogatory
remark because
if I was a good teacher
you would have understood it
you would have surrendered yourself to God
you would have become
Mukta Purusha then you need
not have attended
then who is going to attend
am I going to be there permanently
no I am also going to attain
Mukti you are also going
to attain Mukti
but the mould
do you understand mould
somebody prepares a mould
we all do it at home
especially Deepavali time
we melt the sugar
and pour it into the mould
and it gives here is a parrot's head
here is a
horse's head etc etc
so Bhagawan also
more intelligent than us
who is going to think 100 times about it
I will create a mould
and then every Yoga
every Kalpa He will do the same things
that is what He wants
He thought let me recollect
what I did and let me
repeat so
so He wanted to create
now the problem comes
where is the material
He was the material
He was the material cause
He was the intelligence
He was the intelligent cause
He was the instrument
His thought was the instrument
His visualization was the instrument
so He himself became
instrumental cause
intelligent cause
and material cause
that means
what does it mean
it means this whole universe is nothing but
manifestation of
Paramatma only
nothing else in every way
then what is all this Veda
really there is no Veda
so there are
two views but a few
more points are there
I want how did He create
now here is a potter
what does he do
he spends time
he spends energy
how he acquires
first of all some
raw material it is not
even prepared material
and then
that should be appropriate
material and he adds water
and he goes on
kneading it like we knead
chapati dough or wheat
dough etc etc etc
or we prepare
idli dough by
pasting
it in a
nowadays it is done by electronic machines
earlier they use it to
what is
called a stone
with a hole
and go on
taking it round and round and round
pouring little water
but that taste is marvelous
really speaking no electronic machine
could give that
so is it that way
no because
like a scientist
what does he do
he visualizes
he has knowledge
he is very knowledgeable
the best illustration for understanding
this we create our
dreams
best illustration
what do we do
prediction
what happens
each one of us become our dream world
jagat
dream people
and a dream I, dream you
dream everything
dream world everything I have become
through what instrument
I am the instrument
and
how do I become
I just imagine it is nothing but
imagination
so long as it is appearing
we are under the illusion
that it is real
it is true like the waking
state no
so how do we know
how do we know because that which is true
can never become
can never be destroyed it will be there
for eternity truth will be
there for eternity
here what do we see
that as soon as a person wakes up
then the whole
dream world
we understand that is a dream world
similarly
in this waking state also
we are thinking now
it is real, is it really real
no, is yesterday's world
today's world, no
so many things have changed
I have become aged by one day
so also you
so also the whole universe
everything in this world
as if is
a stream
in a river
whatever falls there
it is moving
slowly or fast
it was never there in the original place
that is why
a great Greek philosopher had said
no man steps
into the same river twice
so many meanings
are there, what is it
is this real world, no it is not
real, there are two views
some people say
really it is a
real world
God has created, since God
has created it can never be
a mythia world, it can be only
a real world
but Advaitins
non-Advaitins
all Advaitins
they take the view of Parinama Vada
that is really God
has become the world
but Advaitins take
the Vada, it is
what is this one, only
apparent, that is all
it only is appearing
it is not true
at all, so that is
the nothing, just like
we have not changed in the
dream world, this is called
Vivarta Vada
Vivarta means
like a row
appearing to us
is a snake
beautiful example
many times we have referred
many times we will refer
a rope
is there, it will be there
for all time to come
but where is the snake
not on the rope
not in the rope
but in our brains
so instead of trying
to bring a stick and then trying
to beat the rope
it will be far easier
so you just
get one big
blow to your own head
then you will see
you will fall unconscious
by that time you come to
it will be day time, then you look
and say, oh it is only a rope
it is like that
so this is the Vada, doesn't
matter, we are not going into
controversy, which is right, which is wrong
because I have
my own
view about it
I will just mention it so that
you also will benefit by it
I have mentioned it earlier also
just we have to remind it
again and again, supposing
you have a needle
and you have done some
needle work
you have repaired some cloth
something whatever it is
and safely kept it there
and after a few days
you required the
needed the needle but you
have forgotten where you have hidden it
so safely
so
what should you do
instead of wasting time
go and borrow from the neighbour
or buy one new one from the
nearby shop and bring it
finish your work and then
let me keep it this time very
safely and you go to the
place where you have thought
and then you find the first
needle also, what is the point
of this illustration, the point
is even if I know
that there is a needle
so long as I don't know
where it is, it is
completely useless
so I will have to go and buy it
Advaitins say
you don't need to search for Brahman
so it is like searching
for a needle because
it is there already, you are
that but I don't
know that and even if
I know that, I don't know where
that Brahman is, I don't have
that knowledge, so long as I don't
have, it makes no difference
to me whether you
teach Dvaita or Advaita
I require to get
enlightenment for that
I have to do Sadhana, through
Sadhana by whatever means
by God's grace
I will get enlightenment
and then I know that
there was no creation
and that is all later on
but for the moment
it makes no difference for Sadhana
whether you believe in
Dvaita or Advaita, our
beliefs do not count at all
what counts?
what transformation
am I bringing in my life
and if I can bring about
100's of a transformation
in my life, I will be
happy 100%
right now
and if I can bring
2% of transformation
my happiness will
double now from 1%
to 2%
so every step
forward is an increase
in 3 things
every step forward
increases my
progress, manifests
in me 3 things
what are they? Sat
Chit and Ananda
what does that mean?
just like you know Ram Krishna
gives this example
as you near the
ocean you can hear the
roar of the wind or you
can feel the coolness of
the breeze more and more
similarly as we progress
towards God and
God's nature is Sat, Chit
and Ananda
and our Sat will grow
our Chit will grow
our Ananda will grow
this is called progress
what does it mean?
it means first of all Sat means
goodness, purity
Sat means
Satyam, I will
be leading an authentic life
I will be speaking the truth
and I will be living
a truthful life
Satyam means Bhagwa
I am approaching
God, I am becoming
more and more like God
as we approach fire
we don't remain
separate from it, the fire becomes
one with us, our body
gets more heated
what does it mean technically?
it means we are becoming
fiery, anyone
who manages to touch
us, we give the same
effect as the fire
that is the first
effect, Sat and
everybody can understand it
this person is a Sat
Purusha, good person
trustworthy person
and he is a person
who is less selfish
and he is a person whom
I can trust, he is a person
to whom I can open my heart
he will not betray me
he will not take advantage of me
that is why Sri Ram Krishna
used to say Sat Sangatya
what does that mean?
most often
we don't think about them
Sat Sangatya means
association of the holy
what does it mean?
not simply go and sit
like Sri Ram Krishna used
to say that
when the Malaya breeze
blows, there are
certain types of plants, trees
which will never turn into
sandalwood, but there are
some who will instantaneously
turn into
sandalwood trees
but there are some, there will be
no transformation at all
that means what?
Sat Sangatya means
we must become slowly
slowly transformed
it is not going, sitting
listening to something, discussing
something and having
nice gala time and having
a tasty prasada
have you noticed?
always prasada
after the puja will be very tasty
why?
because God has tasted it
and left it for us
whatever is tasted by mother
will be very sweet for the baby
like that
transformation, real transformation
then chit
what is the chit?
our power of discrimination
viveka buddhi will grow
with viveka buddhi
vairagyam will develop automatically
when we come to know
this is poison
we don't need to think 100 times
shall I give it up or not
so automatically
it should happen, if it doesn't happen
that means my viveka
is a defective viveka
similarly
my ananda
by thinking about God
by listening to God
by reading about God
by conversing with God
Bhagavad Gita also tells
devotees, true devotees
address each other
you talk about God, I will listen
I will talk about God, you listen
let us listen to somebody else
let us meditate upon God
whatever ways we can
absorb God, let us absorb
this is how
they are highly satisfied
not only that, they are never
satisfied, the moment
they taste it, they say
we want more, we want much more
they become addicted as it were
like alcoholics
only God alcoholic
not workaholic
not sweet alcoholic etc
that is what
I have to understand
so, there are so many
meanings are there
that is, this world is created
it is not created
like a potter creating
a pot, it is
manifestation of God
just as we manifest
in the dream state
and then who are all of us
none other than God
that is the meaning
tat tvam asi
the what, that
I am Atma, Brahma
your Atma
this your Atma
is Brahman
in this
Aitareya Upanishad, in the third chapter
third part of this
Upanishad, Prajnanam Brahma
is one of the
Rig Vedic Mahabhakyas
Prajnanam
your consciousness
is nothing but Brahman
that which you claim
as your intelligence
as your knowledge
as your memory
as your power of awareness
is nothing other than
God only
only we
don't give credit to that
and that is what is going to come
the whole world
this is one of the other
lessons we have to learn
usually in this world
we divide the world into
living and non-living
what is called with consciousness
and inert
jada
but from this mantra
we understand since Bhagwan
only, Paramatma only is manifesting
there is nothing
called inert because
Paramatma is
Chaitanya Swaroopa
Chit means Chaitanya
Ananda Swaroopa
even a rock
today's talk
I will complete
the first mantra with this
of course some points are there
we will talk about it
later on
but Sri Ramakrishna used to
very often quote
you are none other than Brahman
remove this limitation
that limitation is called Ahamkara
if you remove that Ahamkara
everything is
nothing but God
and Sri Ramakrishna was
one day walking
on the banks of Ganges
and then something
is behind me
he felt it, so he looked back
there was a quite a
sizeable stone
was there
and he thought
oh that was a stone, it was not there before
how did it come here
so this time he was
observing, when Sri Ramakrishna
was moving forward
a stone was jumping and following
him, when he stopped
it stopped
when he started, it started
Sri Ramakrishna
rubbed his eyes and then
looked back and then same
thing continued to happen
then later on he said
who is going to put
a line, draw a line
and say this is living
this is non-living, nobody can
do it, for a person
who knows everything
nothing is a Sheela
but you see, I will end
this talk with reminder
Gautama Rishi cursed
Ahalya that may you
become a stone
really, if she becomes a stone
will she be able to think
about God, no
what was she doing
she became completely unconscious
of the outer world
only meditating upon
Sri Rama and
when her Siddhi
perfection came, Sri Rama
came, touched her, woke her up
it is not that Sheela
became a Sri, that
she became conscious of the
external world
May Sri Ramakrishna, Holy Mother
and Swami Vivekananda
bless us all with Bhakti
Ramakrishna


In this world, we find something very peculiar. When a person is enjoying this world, he never thinks of anything else. He always gives credit to himself. "I have worked hard, and I have earned it. It is my divine right to enjoy it." But when the opposite happens, a person starts thinking, "Who is responsible for my suffering? I don't want to suffer at all."
Here, the ''Upanishad'' is going to tell us that ''Srishti'' is not created, never meant either for happiness or for suffering. What then is it meant for? Both happiness and suffering, enjoyment and pain, they are meant only for one purpose. What lessons can we learn and get out of this place? Both are necessary, like two wings of a bird. A bird can never fly with only one wing. Perhaps it can, but it is so much more difficult. But it is impossible without the wings for a bird to fly. Without legs, man cannot easily travel.
Now what is the point? Creation is meant for us, so that we can experience the world, and we can learn the lessons. Very often I tell people that one of the best scriptures in the world is newspapers. You may be surprised. Thakur used to hate newspapers because it contains worldly things. But if we have the eyes of wisdom with one attitude, we should study anything, be it scriptures, be it newspapers, anything with one purpose. What is this going to teach me? What lessons can I learn?
Scriptures also can tell us, but very often we are surprised. The scriptures tell us how to look at the world. For example, you are born, and you grow up; one day you will die. Anything that is born is going to die. We know this; we experience it; we see it every day, but we don't learn our lesson. That is the way the scripture is trying to tell us because the scripture not only tells us that God exists, we have come from God, the entire creation has come from God, and our goal is to go back from where we have come. '''Mano chalo nija nikethane'',' O mind, let us go back to our own abode, our abode, our birthplace. It is only God, but that fact we do not know. That is what the scriptures tell us. That is why they are called ''Apaurusheya. Apaurusheya'' means whatever we experience, so we can only convey what we know to other people. And what we know is this world only. And therefore, what can this world teach? It can teach us a lot."
What is it that we want? We don't want to die. We don't want to become old. We don't want to suffer. Always we want to be happy. Can we get it in this world? Absolutely not. If we really analyse and compare, what is the proportion of suffering to the amount of happiness we get? Is it at least 50-50%? No.
Swami Yathishanth Maharaj used to tell a beautiful story. Once a man went to a restaurant in England. At that time, the Second World War was going on, and food material was very scarce. He had not tasted rabbit meat for a long time. But suddenly, to his great delight, he found a restaurant announcing rabbit meat served here. So gladly, he rushed in to order a dish of rabbit meat. He was served. He was eating. He knew what rabbit's meat tastes like, but he was not getting it. So he called the cook and said, "Is there really rabbit flesh here?" The cook said, "Yes, sir." "I don't get the taste." Then the waiter confessed, "Sir, rabbits are very scarce, so we have to mix some horse flesh." "Oh! So what is the proportion?" He said, "50-50." "What is 50-50?" "One rabbit versus one horse." Naturally, he was not getting the taste of the rabbit.
At least, if we can get 50% of happiness in this world, we can say that some justification is there. But truly, if we say 23 hours and 58 minutes of a day, we are labouring hard, and maybe one or two seconds we get some experience of pleasure. How much time does it take to prepare a sweet? How much time does it take to really enjoy it? Before, there is hard work, and afterward, we have to digest it. So many complications can come later on. But that moment, alone we count, forget everything, and the world is very happy. No.
As I was saying earlier, newspapers can teach us a great lesson. Two such lessons we can learn. I am highlighting them. What is the first lesson? The very first lesson is that everything is fast changing in this world. That is the first part of the first lesson. The second part of the first lesson is people are the same. Life is the same from the beginning of creation until eternity. Nothing changes. There were good people, there were bad people, and the proportion is like 50-50. So this has not changed. Previously, we called them ''Rakshasas, Ravanasuras''. Now we call them politicians, Hitlers. No difference at all. But the people who suffer are ordinary people. Even now, the same thing is going on. That's why ''Swamiji'' made a remarkable statement. There is no democracy anywhere to be found. Everywhere, people are ruled by a few number of selfish, petty, but very powerful, ruthless people. Call them politicians by whatever blessed name you want to call them. So this is the first lesson.
What is the second lesson? If you have to read the newspaper, then you read the obituary column. People you know, people you don't know, young, old, they are dead. It could be murder, it could be an accident, it could be old age, it could be for any reason. If we read the newspaper in this way, then we can learn a great lesson. Because I am in the world, I can also change.
But the most important lesson we learn from the scriptures. Now I am discriminating between the newspaper and the scripture. The newspaper tells us what is the nature of the world very vividly. But the scripture alone can tell us. Is there any way out? Yes. Does God exist? Yes. What do I gain if I realize God? If I go to God? If I am with Him? Call it ''Moksha''. Call it ''Vaikuntha''. Call it the attainment of ''Brahman''. Let us not quarrel with words. What do I gain? For eternity, I will have no death. I will have only Sat. I will never be ignorant. I will be all-knowing. And I will be ''Paramananda Swaroopa''. I will not have happiness. I will repeat. I will not have happiness. I become happiness. That is my nature. And in this world, whatever we are experiencing, this is called experiential happiness. It is all coming. That is called the having mode of happiness, not the being mode of happiness. This is the essence of every ''Upanishad''. It wants to tell us what we should have learned. Without the aid of any scripture, the nature of the world, there is birth, there is growth, there is death. Nobody lives forever, and we cannot separate happiness and unhappiness. They come together. They also go together.
But the world can never tell us where from the world has come and who is the originator or what is the nature of the cause, ''Karana. Sarva Karana Karana''. And what is the nature of that ''Karana''. And reminds us, ''Karana'' and ''Karya'' can never be different. If clay is the ''Karana'', anything made out of clay will be only clay, etc. We discussed already about it. If I am coming from God, if you are coming from God, if the entire ''Loka'' is coming from God, then it must be God only because the world is the effect, and God is the original cause. This is the great lesson.
But there are further lessons. I am telling you this because we have many misunderstandings about creation. So the next misunderstanding about creation is that why God has created me. Of course, the real answer we will never know. From our experience only, we can understand. God created the world, not for His sake, but for our sake.
What is it? I have done ''Karma'', and therefore I create my own world to exhaust my own ''Purva Janma Karma''. So who is the ''Brahma''? I am the ''Brahma''. Who is the Vishnu? I am the Vishnu. And who is the Shiva? I am the Shiva. I created this world. I am maintaining the world, and I dissolve the world. How did I create the world? Because of my ''Purva Karma''. And how am I maintaining? To exhaust my ''Purva Janma Karma Phala''. ''Purva Janma'' doesn't mean only the very last birth. No. It could be any of the millions of births I had previously. Then what am I doing? I am creating new ''Karma''. I cannot have any power to change what has happened in the past. But God has given us that freedom. From this moment onwards, whatever can be done, I can do it consciously, purposefully, with thoughtfulness. That is the purpose. So, this is how we have to understand.
Like ''Brahma'' also has a day and night. But that ''Brahma'' is like the grandmother. In Sri Ramakrishna's parable, there is a grandmother, and she gathers different seeds from different vegetables after the harvest is over. She dries the seeds and keeps the seeds. When the next rainy season comes, what does she do? She prepares the ground. She puts the seeds. Where from the seed has come? From its past birth. And what does it grow into? Into its own nature. But this analogy has to be expanded. Human beings have the freedom. Slowly but surely, by taking the advice of the teachers, the scriptures, our own ''anubhava, acharya, shastra, swanubhava'', we can slowly become better people. But we have to struggle for it. That is why in the Bhagavad Gita, the very first opening ''shloka, dharmakshetram kurukshetram. dharmakshetre kurukshetre. Dharmakshetram. Kshetram'' means a field. The field means that which is ready for cultivation. But it is called ''dharmakshetra.'' You sow poisonous seeds, a poisonous plant will grow. You sow seeds of sweet mango, sweet mangoes will grow. That is why it is called ''dharmakshetra''. It will not give a result which we do not deserve. But at the same time, it is ''kurukshetra. Kuru'' means do. You will have to cultivate it. If you simply sit, it is not going to happen. No result will come. But it is not true that if we do not do anything, no result will come. That is not true. If we do not do, we will become worse and worse.
Just like if we do not do exercise, we are going only to become worse and worse. This is the background. ''Srishti'' is good, and if we are enjoying or suffering, we are responsible. ''Srishti'' is good because every millisecond is a new opportunity for us to learn our lessons. Our first lesson is what have I learned from this life until now. Second lesson is what can I do to better my situation. This is called evolution. And God is always ready to bestow His grace.
With this background, we will start. Already I have started. The first ''mantra'' is telling an irrefutable fact. What is that fact?
''om atma va idameka evagra asinnanyatki.nchana mishat.''
What does it mean? Om is for the sake of beginning something auspicious. ''Atmava''. So which ''Atma''? Is it ''Jeevatma'' or ''Paramatma''? It is only ''Paramatma'' because ''Srishti'' has not started. Without ''Srishti'', the question of ''Jeevatma'' does not arise. So therefore, ''Atmava Idam'' means whatever was existing ''Eka Eva Agre Asit'', Only one ''Atman'' is there. ''Ekaha Eva'', One only. Why those words? ''Ekaha'' means there are technical reasons for that, and we are thankful to Shankaracharya for expounding those technical reasons.
What is the nature of this world? First of all, it is an effect. And this world has three characteristics. What are those? It is full of differences. I, you, he, she, they, it, living, non-living, and all the differences in the world are subdivided by ''Vedanta'' into three categories. They are called ''Vijatiya Bheda, Sajatiya Bheda'', and ''Swagata Bheda''. What is ''Vijatiya Bhed''a? As an example, two trees are there, a mango tree and a coconut tree or two animals are there, a cow and an elephant. Everything is different from everything else. Then, not only that, having divided ''Vijatiya'', in every ''Jati'' also, there is a ''Sajatiya''. No two human beings are alike. It is said that no two hairs on the head of a human being are ever exactly the same. There will be colour differences, differences of size, length, colour, fragility, etc. Once I have seen a book, it is full of photographs. What are the photographs? Somebody had taken the snowfall. Snow is falling mostly in the western countries. In Himalayas also you can see snow is raining, and when the snow is falling, this person had taken a very special camera, a very magnifying camera. Each of these snowflakes can be magnified a thousand times or even more in size. And then this person was astonished. He started taking photos everywhere. And then what did he find? First of all, no two snowdrops are of the same size. Secondly, every snowdrop is of that delicate, intricate, inimitable design. It is astonishing, as if a goldsmith had designed these things. It is what they call nowadays designer cloths or designer snowdrops. Only ''Bhagawan'' can do it. When we look at them on the ground, they all look the same. Here also looks the same. But when we look at each separate individual, no two leaves are alike, no two heaves are alike, no two snowdrops are alike. This is called ''Sajatiya Bheda''.
Then, even if you take one tree, for example, both are coconut trees or both are mango trees, take any one tree, one mango tree, this is called ''Swagatha Bheda''. There is a difference. This is the root. This is the trunk. This is the big branch. Big branch gives birth to so many smaller branches. And they give birth to still smaller branches. Then there are leaves. Then there are blossoms. Then there are fruits. Everything is different. Every part is different from each other. And a very marvellous fact is, on the same tree, there will be so many birds, and all of them, some are eating the fruits, some are eating the leaves, some worms are eating, some insects are eating the bark, some are eating, burrowing into the tree. For example, there is a bird which pecks into the tree, makes a hole and sucks the juice out of it. It is called woodpecker. So, so many birds, every part of the tree is utilized.
What is this ''Paramatma''? He is ''Eka Ewa''. There is no ''Vijatiya Bheda'', there is no ''Sajjatiya Bheda'', and there is no ''Swagatha Bjeda. Eka,'' there is no second one other than Him. And that is said, ''na anyat kinchana mishat. Mishat'' means, literal meaning winking. ''Mishat'' means what? That which is a second creature, a second object. That's why ''Eka Ewa''. Nothing is there. Neither living. ''Mishat'' means winking. Winking means only a living creature. I am winking. You are winking. A dog is winking. etc, etc. So ''na kinchana''. Not even one. ''Mishat'', winking creature. That means living.
Shankaracharya adds, ''mishat'' means, also we have to take ''amishat'', means there is neither a living being nor non-living. This difference between the living and the non-living will come only after the ''srishti''. So, what does ''srishti mantra'' mean? Only ''Paramatma'' was. But we have to extend the meaning and said even after this creation has come out, there is nothing else but only ''Paramatma''. In order to make us understand it, ''sa ikshata'' has been changed into ''aikshata. Aikshata'' means he saw. He saw means he visualized. He visualized means he thought. He thought means he is, see, in this world, whenever we look at any object, we find two causes. One is called material cause. Another is called intelligent cause. We can also add another cause that is called instrumental cause.
Take the familiar example. A potter takes clay. Clay is the material cause. Then he takes a wheel, that is called instrumental cause. And then he is the intelligent cause. ''Nimitta'' in Sanskrit intelligent cause is called ''nimitta karana'' and ''upadana karana'' means material cause. So with the help of some instrument, an intelligent cause fashions, creates something different, but he requires a material. So here, the ''Aitareya Upanishad'' is telling us that there is only ''Paramatma,'' and He created this world. That detail will come later on. But we are forestalling what is to come.
So, he said that let me create the worlds. Then you know, ''Bhagawan'' is called ''satyakamaha, satya sankalpaha''. Very beautiful words. What does it mean? First of all, ''satyakamaha'' means He will never wish for anything which is ''asatya, mithya''. That is which is changing, which is not useful, which is inauspicious, etc. Whatever He desires, it will be only ''satya''. And there is a beautiful saying ''satyam eva jayate na anrutam''. That is untruth can never prime. Only truth because untruth will change. ''Satyam'' will never change. So the technical definition of ''satyam'' is ''trikala abadhitam satyam''. That which never changes in three times, past, present, and future. That is defined technically as ''satyam''.
When ''Bhagawan'' wishes, He cannot wish anything else because even if He wishes something untruth, let me create, He cannot create because He is the ''Vishwabrahmanda.'' He is infinite. There is nothing besides Him. ''Ekameva agre asit''. He cannot wish. And then He is also called ''satyasankalpaha''. Whatever wish comes into His mind, immediately it gets fulfilled. We get this tenesisya as tremendous faith in these scriptures and in the ''Guru''. That is called ''Shraddha''. As an example of this ''Shraddha'', many times I have quoted, maybe in other contexts, there was a disciple of Sri Ramakrishna. He was called Nagamahasaya, and one day he came to see Sri Ramakrishna at Dakshineswar or Kazipur, I do not remember, and as he was about to enter the room, he heard I feel like eating an ''amlaki'', a sour fruit, a peculiar type of fruit. Immediately he left the place. That was not this. It is a seasonal fruit. It is impossible to get it practically at other seasons. You know many things when they are not seasonal, we human beings are intelligent. We pickle them. Every country does it, whether it is cabbage, cauliflower, or brinjal, tomato, and of course lemon and ''amlaki,'' everything. But Nagamahasaya had that faith. My ''Guru's'' mouth uttered these words. It must be somewhere. He went and started searching in gardens continuously for three days without sleep. He searched. At last he found a few ''amlakis'' hanging and then with the permission of the watchman took those things, straight came back to Sri Ramakrishna.
See the ''Guru Bhakti'' now. Sri Ramakrishna was very happy. Now you must have read this incident, but what we have to understand is, did you think that there is any meaning behind this incident? Was Sri Ramakrishna like us, really longing for eating an ''amlaki''? A man of what is called ''Nirvikalpa Samadhi'', do you think he cannot live? Strange thing is, when we are sick, our body automatically longs for something which is useful for the body to repair itself because this ''amlaki'' contains a high quantity of vitamin C and so many other things I don't know, but it is very health productive. Was it or he wanted to test, to show to other people the ''Shraddha'' or what were the other people doing? Sir, we are very sorry it is not available now. They did not have the ''Shraddha''. That means what? They considered him as an ordinary person. He simply had this desire, and now unfortunately we would like to fulfil it, but we know it is not possible.
Naga Maharshi thought it is impossible that a word like that will come from a ''Satyavanta Purusha'' because ''Brahma'' with ''Brahmaiva Bhavati'', whatever comes from his mouth, from the mouth of a realized soul, must be real only. ''Satyakamaha Satyasankalpaha''. Remember the story of Satyakama Jabala? He was Satyakama, that is why he spoke the truth, that is why the ''Guru'' also, who was an enlightened soul, he also has accepted him because he spoke the truth. What was the truth? I am a bastard, that was the truth. But who can say I am a bastard? Only a ''Brahmana''. Who is a ''Brahmana''? A ''Satyavanta'', only who can speak the truth.
Now Sri Ramakrishna took, and he was very observant, his eyes are extraordinarily observant. He noticed that Nagamashaya had not eaten. Already he was sickly looking and now even three days very tired but extremely happy I could fulfill my ''Guru's'' desire. Then Sri Ramakrishna immediately asked please go and take food. Nagamashaya, you know what he did? He refused. He did not say no, he said, "Sir, I am fasting because today is ''Ekadashi'' and I was observing ''Ekadashi'', I will not take." What did Sri Ramakrishna do? He said okay. He asked a devotee to bring a big plate full of food from downstairs, and it was brought, and Sri Ramakrishna just touched a little bit to his mouth and said now you eat. And without murmur Nagamashaya ate it. Why? Because ''Guru Prasada'' is even more sacred than any ''Prasada'', and fast can be broken. What is the purpose of fasting? To obtain more devotion to God. What is the purpose of eating ''Guru Prasada''? To have more ''Guru Bhakti''. And ''Guru Bhakti'' is more of Divine ''Bhakti''.
We have seen the very last ''mantras'' of the ''Shwetashwetra Upanishad. Yasya Deve Para Bhakti Yatha Guru Tatha Deve Yatha Deve Tatha Guru''. No difference between ''Ishta Devata'' and ''Guru''. Nagamashaya exemplified, illustrated that tremendous Shraddha, these are the lessons we have to learn, and here also, we have to learn the lessons. What is the meaning of ''Agra Eka Eva''? ''Agra'' means before creation, only ''Paramatma'' was there; therefore, what is the implication? The whole creation must have come from Him because there was nothing else. But what was the nature of ''Paramatma''? He is what is called three types of ''Bhedas: Abhedaha, Bheda Rahitaha'', is not having ''Ide Vijatiye Bheda, Sajjatiye Bheda, Swagata Bheda''. That is the one meaning of ''Eka'' because He is partless, ''Akhanda''. He is also ''Ananta.'' He was there, and He is ''Nitya, Shuddha, Buddha, Mukta, Swaroopaha''. Nothing else but that. ''Ekam Eva Agra Asit,'' and nothing was there. That means before creation He was alone there. Then what did He do? ''Sa aikshata'', then He thought. He visualized. ''Lokannu Srija Iti,'' may I become many. Let me create the worlds is the literal meaning. ''Lokannu Srija Iti,'' let me create the worlds. Now, if He was like a potter, He required material cause like a potter requires, a potter cannot make a pot out of himself. He has to take another substance which is called clay, a goldsmith, gold, a carpenter, wood. So also here, ''Bhagawan'', there is nothing else, that is said, ''Na Anyat Kinchana'', nothing else is there. That means what? He is the material cause. Then ''Aikshata'' means what? He desired, He visualized. What is the meaning of visualizing? Previous ''Kalpa'' I have created like this, so this ''Kalpa'' also I will create exactly the same thing. This is one of the strangest truths.
Swami Vivekananda expounds that this world, which you and I see, has witnessed the oppression of India by various powers over time. It began with the Turks, then the Mughals, followed by the French, Dutch, and finally the British. The current era is marked by the domination of India by our present enlightened politicians, who often engage in quarrelling and shouting at each other. This historical pattern of subjugation was present in the ''Purva Kalpa'', and it has remained consistent throughout history. This enduring reality demonstrates that it is deeply rooted, stretching back to the ''Anadi Kala,'' which signifies a time without a beginning.
In light of this, do I need to attend the ''Aitreya Upanishad'' class that you're expounding, again in the next ''Kalpa''? Unfortunately, yes, you will have to attend it again. This is not a compliment but rather a derogatory remark because, as a good teacher, I would have expected you to understand and surrender yourself to God, achieving ''Mukta Purusha'', and thereby avoiding the need for further instruction.
You might wonder who will attend the class if not you. However, neither you nor I will be there permanently. We will both attain ''Mukti'' (liberation). But, think of it as a mould, similar to how we create moulds during festivals like Diwali, where we melt sugar and pour it into moulds to create various shapes, like a parrots head, an elephant's head like that. ''Bhagawan'', being more intelligent than us, thought of creating a mould that He repeats in every ''Yuga'' and every ''Kalpa. Lokan Srijayate.''
Now, the question arises: where did He find the material for this creation? The answer is that He Himself is the material cause, the intelligent cause, and the instrumental cause. In other words, the entire universe is nothing but a manifestation of ''Paramatma'', and nothing else.
So, what about the ''Bhedas''? Some argue there is no real ''Bheda''. However, there are a few more points to consider. How did He create? Just like a potter, He visualized, had knowledge, and used His intelligence. An excellent way to understand this is to consider our dreams – we create dream worlds with dream people and a dream "I". It's all imagination, and while it's appearing, we consider it real. Whereas truth will be there for eternity. However, as soon as we wake up, we realize it was just a dream.
Similarly, the waking state is not entirely real. It changes from day to day, and nothing in this world remains constant. It's like a stream in a river, always moving and changing. As a Greek philosopher said, "No man steps into the same river twice." The world is not real in the absolute sense, and there are two views on this. Some believe it is a real world created by God, while others argue it is not. Since God has created it, it can never be a mythic world; it can only be a real world. However, ''Advaitins'' and non-''Advaitins'' hold differing views. While ''Advaitins'' subscribe to the concept of ''Parinama Vada'', believing that God has truly become the world, non-''Advaitins'' adopt the view that it is merely apparent, existing only as an illusion.
This perspective posits that the world is like a mirage, akin to a snake appearing on a rope. An apt analogy can be drawn to a rope, which remains unchanged. The illusion of a snake is not in the rope itself but in our perception. Instead of attempting to beat the rope with a stick to dispel the illusion, it's far simpler to take a single blow to your own head, leading to a temporary unconsciousness. Upon awakening, you realize it was only a rope.
However, this is just a perspective, and it doesn't necessitate delving into controversies about what is right or wrong. I have my own view on this, which I'll mention for your benefit. It's crucial to reiterate that, whether one adheres to ''Dvaita'' or ''Advaita'', the fundamental point remains that we must focus on self-improvement.
Let me offer you an analogy: Imagine you have a needle and have used it for needlework. After some time, you've forgotten where you've stored it safely. Instead of wasting time searching for it, you opt to borrow one from a neighbour or purchase a new one from a nearby store to complete your task. However, upon revisiting the location where you thought you'd hidden the needle, you find the original one. The point of this analogy is that, even if you knew the needle existed, it was useless because you didn't know where it was. ''Advaitins'' assert that you don't need to search for ''Brahman'' (the divine reality) because it's already there; you are that. However, without the knowledge of its location, it makes no difference whether you subscribe to ''Dvaita'' or ''Advaita''. It does not matter what ''Sadhana'' you do. What truly matters is the transformation in your life. Even if I can bring about a small transformation in my life I will be very happy. Every step forward in your spiritual journey leads to the increase of three things within you: ''Sat'' (goodness), ''Chit'' (consciousness), and ''Ananda'' (bliss). This progress is synonymous with growing closer to God, as His nature is characterized by ''Sat, Chit'', and ''Ananda''. It signifies that your purity, authenticity, and truthfulness will increase as you approach God. As we approach fire, we don't remain separate from it; the fire becomes one with us, and our body becomes warmer. This metaphorically implies that we become more "fiery" in nature. People who come into contact with us experience the same transformative effect as they would with fire.
This progression is not solely a surface-level change; it signifies a deep transformation. It's not about merely attending spiritual discussions, sitting in holy gatherings, and enjoying delicious ''prasada. Sat Sangatya'', the association of the holy, must lead to genuine transformation.
Sri Ramakrishna used to explain that when the Malaya breeze blows, certain trees instantly turn into sandalwood trees, while others remain unchanged. In the same way, ''Sat Sangatya'' should gradually lead to a real transformation. It's not just about discussions and enjoying ''prasada''; it's about experiencing true change.
What is "''chit''"? ''Chit'' refers to our power of discrimination, or "''viveka buddh''i." With an awakened ''viveka buddhi, vairagya'' (dispassion) will naturally develop. When we recognize something as poison, we won't need to deliberate a hundred times about giving it up; it will happen automatically. If it doesn't, it indicates that our ''Viveka'', discernment is flawed.
Similarly, our "''ananda''" (bliss) grows by thinking about God, listening to God, reading about God, and conversing with God. The Bhagavad Gita also advises devotees to engage in discussions where they talk about God, and others listen, and vice versa. Devotees are highly content with this, and at the same time, they are never fully satisfied. The moment they taste the divine, they want more and become "addicted" to God, akin to spiritual "alcoholics."
The concept of creation in this world is not akin to a potter creating a pot but rather a manifestation of God. Just as we manifest in the dream state, all of us are none other than God, which embodies the essence of the famous teaching, "''Tat Tvam Asi''" ("Thou art That"). ''Ayam Atma Brahma'', Your "''Atma''" is ''Brahman'', and in the ''Aitareya Upanishad'', it is stated, "''Prajnanam Brahma''," (one of the ''Rig Vedic Mahavakyas'') meaning your consciousness is none other than ''Brahman''. What you claim as intelligence, knowledge, memory, and awareness are all manifestations of God. We often fail to credit this divine nature in our everyday lives.
This ''Upanishad'' teaches us to understand that since ''Paramatma'' (the Supreme Soul) alone is manifesting, there is nothing truly inert in the world. ''Paramatma'' embodies ''Chaitanya Swaroopa'', which signifies that everything is imbued with consciousness and bliss.
Sri Ramakrishna frequently emphasized that we are none other than ''Brahman''. The key is to remove the limitations imposed by the "''Ahamkara''" (ego). When we eliminate this limitation, everything is revealed as God. Sri Ramakrishna recounted an incident when he was walking by the banks of the Ganges. He noticed a substantial stone following him. When he moved forward, it followed, and when he stopped, it stopped. Sri Ramakrishna realized that there was no clear distinction between living and non-living entities. For someone who knows everything, nothing is merely inert.
To conclude, it's worth remembering that Gautama Rishi once cursed Ahalya to become a stone. However, if she were to become a stone, she wouldn't be capable of contemplating God. Instead, she became entirely absorbed in meditation on Sri Rama. Only when her spiritual practice reached perfection, ''Siddhi'', Sri Rama himself came, touched her, and awakened her. It's not that she transformed from a stone to a conscious being; rather, she had already transcended external consciousness through her devotion.
[[Category:Aitareya Upanishad]]
[[Category:Aitareya Upanishad]]

Latest revision as of 03:54, 8 December 2023

Full Transcript(Corrected)

We are studying the Aitareya Upanishad, one of the most marvellous Upanishads. Mostly, this Upanishad starts with a Srishti Krama. What is the point? The point is that if the cause is Atman, the Srishti, the effect must also be Atman. What is the meaning of creation? Why did God create it?

In this world, we find something very peculiar. When a person is enjoying this world, he never thinks of anything else. He always gives credit to himself. "I have worked hard, and I have earned it. It is my divine right to enjoy it." But when the opposite happens, a person starts thinking, "Who is responsible for my suffering? I don't want to suffer at all."

Here, the Upanishad is going to tell us that Srishti is not created, never meant either for happiness or for suffering. What then is it meant for? Both happiness and suffering, enjoyment and pain, they are meant only for one purpose. What lessons can we learn and get out of this place? Both are necessary, like two wings of a bird. A bird can never fly with only one wing. Perhaps it can, but it is so much more difficult. But it is impossible without the wings for a bird to fly. Without legs, man cannot easily travel.

Now what is the point? Creation is meant for us, so that we can experience the world, and we can learn the lessons. Very often I tell people that one of the best scriptures in the world is newspapers. You may be surprised. Thakur used to hate newspapers because it contains worldly things. But if we have the eyes of wisdom with one attitude, we should study anything, be it scriptures, be it newspapers, anything with one purpose. What is this going to teach me? What lessons can I learn?

Scriptures also can tell us, but very often we are surprised. The scriptures tell us how to look at the world. For example, you are born, and you grow up; one day you will die. Anything that is born is going to die. We know this; we experience it; we see it every day, but we don't learn our lesson. That is the way the scripture is trying to tell us because the scripture not only tells us that God exists, we have come from God, the entire creation has come from God, and our goal is to go back from where we have come. 'Mano chalo nija nikethane,' O mind, let us go back to our own abode, our abode, our birthplace. It is only God, but that fact we do not know. That is what the scriptures tell us. That is why they are called Apaurusheya. Apaurusheya means whatever we experience, so we can only convey what we know to other people. And what we know is this world only. And therefore, what can this world teach? It can teach us a lot."

What is it that we want? We don't want to die. We don't want to become old. We don't want to suffer. Always we want to be happy. Can we get it in this world? Absolutely not. If we really analyse and compare, what is the proportion of suffering to the amount of happiness we get? Is it at least 50-50%? No.

Swami Yathishanth Maharaj used to tell a beautiful story. Once a man went to a restaurant in England. At that time, the Second World War was going on, and food material was very scarce. He had not tasted rabbit meat for a long time. But suddenly, to his great delight, he found a restaurant announcing rabbit meat served here. So gladly, he rushed in to order a dish of rabbit meat. He was served. He was eating. He knew what rabbit's meat tastes like, but he was not getting it. So he called the cook and said, "Is there really rabbit flesh here?" The cook said, "Yes, sir." "I don't get the taste." Then the waiter confessed, "Sir, rabbits are very scarce, so we have to mix some horse flesh." "Oh! So what is the proportion?" He said, "50-50." "What is 50-50?" "One rabbit versus one horse." Naturally, he was not getting the taste of the rabbit.

At least, if we can get 50% of happiness in this world, we can say that some justification is there. But truly, if we say 23 hours and 58 minutes of a day, we are labouring hard, and maybe one or two seconds we get some experience of pleasure. How much time does it take to prepare a sweet? How much time does it take to really enjoy it? Before, there is hard work, and afterward, we have to digest it. So many complications can come later on. But that moment, alone we count, forget everything, and the world is very happy. No.

As I was saying earlier, newspapers can teach us a great lesson. Two such lessons we can learn. I am highlighting them. What is the first lesson? The very first lesson is that everything is fast changing in this world. That is the first part of the first lesson. The second part of the first lesson is people are the same. Life is the same from the beginning of creation until eternity. Nothing changes. There were good people, there were bad people, and the proportion is like 50-50. So this has not changed. Previously, we called them Rakshasas, Ravanasuras. Now we call them politicians, Hitlers. No difference at all. But the people who suffer are ordinary people. Even now, the same thing is going on. That's why Swamiji made a remarkable statement. There is no democracy anywhere to be found. Everywhere, people are ruled by a few number of selfish, petty, but very powerful, ruthless people. Call them politicians by whatever blessed name you want to call them. So this is the first lesson.

What is the second lesson? If you have to read the newspaper, then you read the obituary column. People you know, people you don't know, young, old, they are dead. It could be murder, it could be an accident, it could be old age, it could be for any reason. If we read the newspaper in this way, then we can learn a great lesson. Because I am in the world, I can also change.

But the most important lesson we learn from the scriptures. Now I am discriminating between the newspaper and the scripture. The newspaper tells us what is the nature of the world very vividly. But the scripture alone can tell us. Is there any way out? Yes. Does God exist? Yes. What do I gain if I realize God? If I go to God? If I am with Him? Call it Moksha. Call it Vaikuntha. Call it the attainment of Brahman. Let us not quarrel with words. What do I gain? For eternity, I will have no death. I will have only Sat. I will never be ignorant. I will be all-knowing. And I will be Paramananda Swaroopa. I will not have happiness. I will repeat. I will not have happiness. I become happiness. That is my nature. And in this world, whatever we are experiencing, this is called experiential happiness. It is all coming. That is called the having mode of happiness, not the being mode of happiness. This is the essence of every Upanishad. It wants to tell us what we should have learned. Without the aid of any scripture, the nature of the world, there is birth, there is growth, there is death. Nobody lives forever, and we cannot separate happiness and unhappiness. They come together. They also go together.

But the world can never tell us where from the world has come and who is the originator or what is the nature of the cause, Karana. Sarva Karana Karana. And what is the nature of that Karana. And reminds us, Karana and Karya can never be different. If clay is the Karana, anything made out of clay will be only clay, etc. We discussed already about it. If I am coming from God, if you are coming from God, if the entire Loka is coming from God, then it must be God only because the world is the effect, and God is the original cause. This is the great lesson.

But there are further lessons. I am telling you this because we have many misunderstandings about creation. So the next misunderstanding about creation is that why God has created me. Of course, the real answer we will never know. From our experience only, we can understand. God created the world, not for His sake, but for our sake.

What is it? I have done Karma, and therefore I create my own world to exhaust my own Purva Janma Karma. So who is the Brahma? I am the Brahma. Who is the Vishnu? I am the Vishnu. And who is the Shiva? I am the Shiva. I created this world. I am maintaining the world, and I dissolve the world. How did I create the world? Because of my Purva Karma. And how am I maintaining? To exhaust my Purva Janma Karma Phala. Purva Janma doesn't mean only the very last birth. No. It could be any of the millions of births I had previously. Then what am I doing? I am creating new Karma. I cannot have any power to change what has happened in the past. But God has given us that freedom. From this moment onwards, whatever can be done, I can do it consciously, purposefully, with thoughtfulness. That is the purpose. So, this is how we have to understand.

Like Brahma also has a day and night. But that Brahma is like the grandmother. In Sri Ramakrishna's parable, there is a grandmother, and she gathers different seeds from different vegetables after the harvest is over. She dries the seeds and keeps the seeds. When the next rainy season comes, what does she do? She prepares the ground. She puts the seeds. Where from the seed has come? From its past birth. And what does it grow into? Into its own nature. But this analogy has to be expanded. Human beings have the freedom. Slowly but surely, by taking the advice of the teachers, the scriptures, our own anubhava, acharya, shastra, swanubhava, we can slowly become better people. But we have to struggle for it. That is why in the Bhagavad Gita, the very first opening shloka, dharmakshetram kurukshetram. dharmakshetre kurukshetre. Dharmakshetram. Kshetram means a field. The field means that which is ready for cultivation. But it is called dharmakshetra. You sow poisonous seeds, a poisonous plant will grow. You sow seeds of sweet mango, sweet mangoes will grow. That is why it is called dharmakshetra. It will not give a result which we do not deserve. But at the same time, it is kurukshetra. Kuru means do. You will have to cultivate it. If you simply sit, it is not going to happen. No result will come. But it is not true that if we do not do anything, no result will come. That is not true. If we do not do, we will become worse and worse.

Just like if we do not do exercise, we are going only to become worse and worse. This is the background. Srishti is good, and if we are enjoying or suffering, we are responsible. Srishti is good because every millisecond is a new opportunity for us to learn our lessons. Our first lesson is what have I learned from this life until now. Second lesson is what can I do to better my situation. This is called evolution. And God is always ready to bestow His grace.

With this background, we will start. Already I have started. The first mantra is telling an irrefutable fact. What is that fact?

om atma va idameka evagra asinnanyatki.nchana mishat.

What does it mean? Om is for the sake of beginning something auspicious. Atmava. So which Atma? Is it Jeevatma or Paramatma? It is only Paramatma because Srishti has not started. Without Srishti, the question of Jeevatma does not arise. So therefore, Atmava Idam means whatever was existing Eka Eva Agre Asit, Only one Atman is there. Ekaha Eva, One only. Why those words? Ekaha means there are technical reasons for that, and we are thankful to Shankaracharya for expounding those technical reasons.

What is the nature of this world? First of all, it is an effect. And this world has three characteristics. What are those? It is full of differences. I, you, he, she, they, it, living, non-living, and all the differences in the world are subdivided by Vedanta into three categories. They are called Vijatiya Bheda, Sajatiya Bheda, and Swagata Bheda. What is Vijatiya Bheda? As an example, two trees are there, a mango tree and a coconut tree or two animals are there, a cow and an elephant. Everything is different from everything else. Then, not only that, having divided Vijatiya, in every Jati also, there is a Sajatiya. No two human beings are alike. It is said that no two hairs on the head of a human being are ever exactly the same. There will be colour differences, differences of size, length, colour, fragility, etc. Once I have seen a book, it is full of photographs. What are the photographs? Somebody had taken the snowfall. Snow is falling mostly in the western countries. In Himalayas also you can see snow is raining, and when the snow is falling, this person had taken a very special camera, a very magnifying camera. Each of these snowflakes can be magnified a thousand times or even more in size. And then this person was astonished. He started taking photos everywhere. And then what did he find? First of all, no two snowdrops are of the same size. Secondly, every snowdrop is of that delicate, intricate, inimitable design. It is astonishing, as if a goldsmith had designed these things. It is what they call nowadays designer cloths or designer snowdrops. Only Bhagawan can do it. When we look at them on the ground, they all look the same. Here also looks the same. But when we look at each separate individual, no two leaves are alike, no two heaves are alike, no two snowdrops are alike. This is called Sajatiya Bheda.

Then, even if you take one tree, for example, both are coconut trees or both are mango trees, take any one tree, one mango tree, this is called Swagatha Bheda. There is a difference. This is the root. This is the trunk. This is the big branch. Big branch gives birth to so many smaller branches. And they give birth to still smaller branches. Then there are leaves. Then there are blossoms. Then there are fruits. Everything is different. Every part is different from each other. And a very marvellous fact is, on the same tree, there will be so many birds, and all of them, some are eating the fruits, some are eating the leaves, some worms are eating, some insects are eating the bark, some are eating, burrowing into the tree. For example, there is a bird which pecks into the tree, makes a hole and sucks the juice out of it. It is called woodpecker. So, so many birds, every part of the tree is utilized.

What is this Paramatma? He is Eka Ewa. There is no Vijatiya Bheda, there is no Sajjatiya Bheda, and there is no Swagatha Bjeda. Eka, there is no second one other than Him. And that is said, na anyat kinchana mishat. Mishat means, literal meaning winking. Mishat means what? That which is a second creature, a second object. That's why Eka Ewa. Nothing is there. Neither living. Mishat means winking. Winking means only a living creature. I am winking. You are winking. A dog is winking. etc, etc. So na kinchana. Not even one. Mishat, winking creature. That means living.

Shankaracharya adds, mishat means, also we have to take amishat, means there is neither a living being nor non-living. This difference between the living and the non-living will come only after the srishti. So, what does srishti mantra mean? Only Paramatma was. But we have to extend the meaning and said even after this creation has come out, there is nothing else but only Paramatma. In order to make us understand it, sa ikshata has been changed into aikshata. Aikshata means he saw. He saw means he visualized. He visualized means he thought. He thought means he is, see, in this world, whenever we look at any object, we find two causes. One is called material cause. Another is called intelligent cause. We can also add another cause that is called instrumental cause.

Take the familiar example. A potter takes clay. Clay is the material cause. Then he takes a wheel, that is called instrumental cause. And then he is the intelligent cause. Nimitta in Sanskrit intelligent cause is called nimitta karana and upadana karana means material cause. So with the help of some instrument, an intelligent cause fashions, creates something different, but he requires a material. So here, the Aitareya Upanishad is telling us that there is only Paramatma, and He created this world. That detail will come later on. But we are forestalling what is to come.

So, he said that let me create the worlds. Then you know, Bhagawan is called satyakamaha, satya sankalpaha. Very beautiful words. What does it mean? First of all, satyakamaha means He will never wish for anything which is asatya, mithya. That is which is changing, which is not useful, which is inauspicious, etc. Whatever He desires, it will be only satya. And there is a beautiful saying satyam eva jayate na anrutam. That is untruth can never prime. Only truth because untruth will change. Satyam will never change. So the technical definition of satyam is trikala abadhitam satyam. That which never changes in three times, past, present, and future. That is defined technically as satyam.

When Bhagawan wishes, He cannot wish anything else because even if He wishes something untruth, let me create, He cannot create because He is the Vishwabrahmanda. He is infinite. There is nothing besides Him. Ekameva agre asit. He cannot wish. And then He is also called satyasankalpaha. Whatever wish comes into His mind, immediately it gets fulfilled. We get this tenesisya as tremendous faith in these scriptures and in the Guru. That is called Shraddha. As an example of this Shraddha, many times I have quoted, maybe in other contexts, there was a disciple of Sri Ramakrishna. He was called Nagamahasaya, and one day he came to see Sri Ramakrishna at Dakshineswar or Kazipur, I do not remember, and as he was about to enter the room, he heard I feel like eating an amlaki, a sour fruit, a peculiar type of fruit. Immediately he left the place. That was not this. It is a seasonal fruit. It is impossible to get it practically at other seasons. You know many things when they are not seasonal, we human beings are intelligent. We pickle them. Every country does it, whether it is cabbage, cauliflower, or brinjal, tomato, and of course lemon and amlaki, everything. But Nagamahasaya had that faith. My Guru's mouth uttered these words. It must be somewhere. He went and started searching in gardens continuously for three days without sleep. He searched. At last he found a few amlakis hanging and then with the permission of the watchman took those things, straight came back to Sri Ramakrishna.

See the Guru Bhakti now. Sri Ramakrishna was very happy. Now you must have read this incident, but what we have to understand is, did you think that there is any meaning behind this incident? Was Sri Ramakrishna like us, really longing for eating an amlaki? A man of what is called Nirvikalpa Samadhi, do you think he cannot live? Strange thing is, when we are sick, our body automatically longs for something which is useful for the body to repair itself because this amlaki contains a high quantity of vitamin C and so many other things I don't know, but it is very health productive. Was it or he wanted to test, to show to other people the Shraddha or what were the other people doing? Sir, we are very sorry it is not available now. They did not have the Shraddha. That means what? They considered him as an ordinary person. He simply had this desire, and now unfortunately we would like to fulfil it, but we know it is not possible.

Naga Maharshi thought it is impossible that a word like that will come from a Satyavanta Purusha because Brahma with Brahmaiva Bhavati, whatever comes from his mouth, from the mouth of a realized soul, must be real only. Satyakamaha Satyasankalpaha. Remember the story of Satyakama Jabala? He was Satyakama, that is why he spoke the truth, that is why the Guru also, who was an enlightened soul, he also has accepted him because he spoke the truth. What was the truth? I am a bastard, that was the truth. But who can say I am a bastard? Only a Brahmana. Who is a Brahmana? A Satyavanta, only who can speak the truth.

Now Sri Ramakrishna took, and he was very observant, his eyes are extraordinarily observant. He noticed that Nagamashaya had not eaten. Already he was sickly looking and now even three days very tired but extremely happy I could fulfill my Guru's desire. Then Sri Ramakrishna immediately asked please go and take food. Nagamashaya, you know what he did? He refused. He did not say no, he said, "Sir, I am fasting because today is Ekadashi and I was observing Ekadashi, I will not take." What did Sri Ramakrishna do? He said okay. He asked a devotee to bring a big plate full of food from downstairs, and it was brought, and Sri Ramakrishna just touched a little bit to his mouth and said now you eat. And without murmur Nagamashaya ate it. Why? Because Guru Prasada is even more sacred than any Prasada, and fast can be broken. What is the purpose of fasting? To obtain more devotion to God. What is the purpose of eating Guru Prasada? To have more Guru Bhakti. And Guru Bhakti is more of Divine Bhakti.

We have seen the very last mantras of the Shwetashwetra Upanishad. Yasya Deve Para Bhakti Yatha Guru Tatha Deve Yatha Deve Tatha Guru. No difference between Ishta Devata and Guru. Nagamashaya exemplified, illustrated that tremendous Shraddha, these are the lessons we have to learn, and here also, we have to learn the lessons. What is the meaning of Agra Eka Eva? Agra means before creation, only Paramatma was there; therefore, what is the implication? The whole creation must have come from Him because there was nothing else. But what was the nature of Paramatma? He is what is called three types of Bhedas: Abhedaha, Bheda Rahitaha, is not having Ide Vijatiye Bheda, Sajjatiye Bheda, Swagata Bheda. That is the one meaning of Eka because He is partless, Akhanda. He is also Ananta. He was there, and He is Nitya, Shuddha, Buddha, Mukta, Swaroopaha. Nothing else but that. Ekam Eva Agra Asit, and nothing was there. That means before creation He was alone there. Then what did He do? Sa aikshata, then He thought. He visualized. Lokannu Srija Iti, may I become many. Let me create the worlds is the literal meaning. Lokannu Srija Iti, let me create the worlds. Now, if He was like a potter, He required material cause like a potter requires, a potter cannot make a pot out of himself. He has to take another substance which is called clay, a goldsmith, gold, a carpenter, wood. So also here, Bhagawan, there is nothing else, that is said, Na Anyat Kinchana, nothing else is there. That means what? He is the material cause. Then Aikshata means what? He desired, He visualized. What is the meaning of visualizing? Previous Kalpa I have created like this, so this Kalpa also I will create exactly the same thing. This is one of the strangest truths.

Swami Vivekananda expounds that this world, which you and I see, has witnessed the oppression of India by various powers over time. It began with the Turks, then the Mughals, followed by the French, Dutch, and finally the British. The current era is marked by the domination of India by our present enlightened politicians, who often engage in quarrelling and shouting at each other. This historical pattern of subjugation was present in the Purva Kalpa, and it has remained consistent throughout history. This enduring reality demonstrates that it is deeply rooted, stretching back to the Anadi Kala, which signifies a time without a beginning.

In light of this, do I need to attend the Aitreya Upanishad class that you're expounding, again in the next Kalpa? Unfortunately, yes, you will have to attend it again. This is not a compliment but rather a derogatory remark because, as a good teacher, I would have expected you to understand and surrender yourself to God, achieving Mukta Purusha, and thereby avoiding the need for further instruction.

You might wonder who will attend the class if not you. However, neither you nor I will be there permanently. We will both attain Mukti (liberation). But, think of it as a mould, similar to how we create moulds during festivals like Diwali, where we melt sugar and pour it into moulds to create various shapes, like a parrots head, an elephant's head like that. Bhagawan, being more intelligent than us, thought of creating a mould that He repeats in every Yuga and every Kalpa. Lokan Srijayate.

Now, the question arises: where did He find the material for this creation? The answer is that He Himself is the material cause, the intelligent cause, and the instrumental cause. In other words, the entire universe is nothing but a manifestation of Paramatma, and nothing else.

So, what about the Bhedas? Some argue there is no real Bheda. However, there are a few more points to consider. How did He create? Just like a potter, He visualized, had knowledge, and used His intelligence. An excellent way to understand this is to consider our dreams – we create dream worlds with dream people and a dream "I". It's all imagination, and while it's appearing, we consider it real. Whereas truth will be there for eternity. However, as soon as we wake up, we realize it was just a dream.

Similarly, the waking state is not entirely real. It changes from day to day, and nothing in this world remains constant. It's like a stream in a river, always moving and changing. As a Greek philosopher said, "No man steps into the same river twice." The world is not real in the absolute sense, and there are two views on this. Some believe it is a real world created by God, while others argue it is not. Since God has created it, it can never be a mythic world; it can only be a real world. However, Advaitins and non-Advaitins hold differing views. While Advaitins subscribe to the concept of Parinama Vada, believing that God has truly become the world, non-Advaitins adopt the view that it is merely apparent, existing only as an illusion.

This perspective posits that the world is like a mirage, akin to a snake appearing on a rope. An apt analogy can be drawn to a rope, which remains unchanged. The illusion of a snake is not in the rope itself but in our perception. Instead of attempting to beat the rope with a stick to dispel the illusion, it's far simpler to take a single blow to your own head, leading to a temporary unconsciousness. Upon awakening, you realize it was only a rope.

However, this is just a perspective, and it doesn't necessitate delving into controversies about what is right or wrong. I have my own view on this, which I'll mention for your benefit. It's crucial to reiterate that, whether one adheres to Dvaita or Advaita, the fundamental point remains that we must focus on self-improvement.

Let me offer you an analogy: Imagine you have a needle and have used it for needlework. After some time, you've forgotten where you've stored it safely. Instead of wasting time searching for it, you opt to borrow one from a neighbour or purchase a new one from a nearby store to complete your task. However, upon revisiting the location where you thought you'd hidden the needle, you find the original one. The point of this analogy is that, even if you knew the needle existed, it was useless because you didn't know where it was. Advaitins assert that you don't need to search for Brahman (the divine reality) because it's already there; you are that. However, without the knowledge of its location, it makes no difference whether you subscribe to Dvaita or Advaita. It does not matter what Sadhana you do. What truly matters is the transformation in your life. Even if I can bring about a small transformation in my life I will be very happy. Every step forward in your spiritual journey leads to the increase of three things within you: Sat (goodness), Chit (consciousness), and Ananda (bliss). This progress is synonymous with growing closer to God, as His nature is characterized by Sat, Chit, and Ananda. It signifies that your purity, authenticity, and truthfulness will increase as you approach God. As we approach fire, we don't remain separate from it; the fire becomes one with us, and our body becomes warmer. This metaphorically implies that we become more "fiery" in nature. People who come into contact with us experience the same transformative effect as they would with fire.

This progression is not solely a surface-level change; it signifies a deep transformation. It's not about merely attending spiritual discussions, sitting in holy gatherings, and enjoying delicious prasada. Sat Sangatya, the association of the holy, must lead to genuine transformation.

Sri Ramakrishna used to explain that when the Malaya breeze blows, certain trees instantly turn into sandalwood trees, while others remain unchanged. In the same way, Sat Sangatya should gradually lead to a real transformation. It's not just about discussions and enjoying prasada; it's about experiencing true change.

What is "chit"? Chit refers to our power of discrimination, or "viveka buddhi." With an awakened viveka buddhi, vairagya (dispassion) will naturally develop. When we recognize something as poison, we won't need to deliberate a hundred times about giving it up; it will happen automatically. If it doesn't, it indicates that our Viveka, discernment is flawed.

Similarly, our "ananda" (bliss) grows by thinking about God, listening to God, reading about God, and conversing with God. The Bhagavad Gita also advises devotees to engage in discussions where they talk about God, and others listen, and vice versa. Devotees are highly content with this, and at the same time, they are never fully satisfied. The moment they taste the divine, they want more and become "addicted" to God, akin to spiritual "alcoholics."

The concept of creation in this world is not akin to a potter creating a pot but rather a manifestation of God. Just as we manifest in the dream state, all of us are none other than God, which embodies the essence of the famous teaching, "Tat Tvam Asi" ("Thou art That"). Ayam Atma Brahma, Your "Atma" is Brahman, and in the Aitareya Upanishad, it is stated, "Prajnanam Brahma," (one of the Rig Vedic Mahavakyas) meaning your consciousness is none other than Brahman. What you claim as intelligence, knowledge, memory, and awareness are all manifestations of God. We often fail to credit this divine nature in our everyday lives.

This Upanishad teaches us to understand that since Paramatma (the Supreme Soul) alone is manifesting, there is nothing truly inert in the world. Paramatma embodies Chaitanya Swaroopa, which signifies that everything is imbued with consciousness and bliss.

Sri Ramakrishna frequently emphasized that we are none other than Brahman. The key is to remove the limitations imposed by the "Ahamkara" (ego). When we eliminate this limitation, everything is revealed as God. Sri Ramakrishna recounted an incident when he was walking by the banks of the Ganges. He noticed a substantial stone following him. When he moved forward, it followed, and when he stopped, it stopped. Sri Ramakrishna realized that there was no clear distinction between living and non-living entities. For someone who knows everything, nothing is merely inert.

To conclude, it's worth remembering that Gautama Rishi once cursed Ahalya to become a stone. However, if she were to become a stone, she wouldn't be capable of contemplating God. Instead, she became entirely absorbed in meditation on Sri Rama. Only when her spiritual practice reached perfection, Siddhi, Sri Rama himself came, touched her, and awakened her. It's not that she transformed from a stone to a conscious being; rather, she had already transcended external consciousness through her devotion.